Challenges and Opportunities of Managing Productivity and Performance to Increase the Profit while focusing on the Sustainability of People and Planet
In any profit-oriented organization, the prime
objective is to maximize the profitability such that the business is able to
continue their operations without any hindrances while having a consistent
growth. In a competitive business environment, ensuring the continuous
profitability of the business is not an easy task
Operations Management
For an organization to achieve high profits, the
organization needs to focus on cutting down their costs while ensuring the
increase of their sales and income. The process followed in efficiently and
effectively managing the achievement of profits is known as Operations
Management (OM)
Triple Bottom Line Sustainability
The concept of Sustainability came into play with the
Brundtland Report (1987) and continued as a topic of importance due to the
increased awareness and pressure build-up by the world community as an issue of
concern
The Triple-Bottom-Line (TBL) concept was first coined
in 1997 by Elkington (1997) as a concept that expands sustainability beyond the
original environmental considerations into a concept which encompasses profit,
people and planet considerations.
Relationship between Operations Management, TBL
Sustainability, Productivity and Performance Evaluation
With the increased awareness on the TBL sustainability
concept, businesses are facing an emerging pressure to ensure the TBL
sustainability within their value chains
To achieve sustainability, organizations need to
identify the current performance status measured in terms of productivity of
the business processes. Productivity can simply be defined as the ratio between
the outputs and inputs and needs to be evaluated periodically to identify
lagging bottlenecks and to implement corrective measures
With the globalization of businesses the complexity of
the value chains has increased hindering the traceability and thus questioning
the process of monitoring value chain’s conformity with sustainability indices
and performance parameters
Challenges and Opportunities of Managing TBL
Sustainability
Businesses have ventured out of their home country to
capitalize on the low cost and high quality sourcing options available outside.
This has enabled them the opportunity of getting high quality products at lower
prices thereby getting a cost advantage and a high bargaining power over
suppliers
When implementing sustainability within a business, it
requires initial investments for revamping business processes to include
sustainability considerations, for procuring high quality sustainable raw
materials, for technologies such as Blockchain, IoT etc. for tracing and
evaluating sustainable performance. These results in higher costs in comparison
to non-sustainability oriented business and also requires longer lead times to
get desired outcomes from such implementations. Hence, clashes occur between
short-term financial objectives and long-term financial objectives since
short-term objectives need to be compromised for such implementation
When considering the environmental sustainability
aspects, organizations are faced with the challenges of minimizing their carbon
footprint, water usage, product wastage and energy output measures in means of
electricity usage, heat generation etc.
In the aspect of people, organizations are required to
focus on both internal and external stakeholders. With the increased customer
pressure organizations are required to ensure social sustainability up to the
supplier level to ensure the conformity of the suppliers for child labour laws,
human rights violations, fair and safe work conditions
Many of the cutting edge technologies such as IoT, Big
data analytics, Blockchain etc. can be utilized in achieving sustainability by
means of accurate forecasting of customer demands to minimize wastages,
enabling traceability within the value chain, in identifying energy and
resource wastage bottlenecks, in implementing reusable technologies etc.
Despite the availability of concepts and tools for
ensuring the TBL sustainability, it should be noted that the commitment from
the top leadership and linking performance evaluations to sustainability are
mandatory for driving stakeholders towards TBL sustainability
Conclusion
It can be concluded that achieving TBL sustainability
is a challenge for a business of any caliber but with right leadership and commitment
from the employee base the task is not as draining as it seems.
References
Ahmad, Z., 2017. Profit Maximisation as an objective
of a firm-A Robust Perspective. International Journal of Research in
Finance and Marketing (IJRFM), 7(6), p. 217~219.
Ambec, S.
& Lanoie, P., 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy
of Management Perspectives, 22(4), pp. 45-62.
Arunachalam,
D., Kumar, N. & Kawalek, J., 2018. Understanding big data analytics
capabilities in supply chain management: Unravelling the issues, challenges
and implications for practice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics
and Transportation Review, Volume 114, pp. 416-436.
Ballou, R.
H., Gilbert, S. M. & Mukherjee, A., 2000. New Managerial Challenges from
Supply Chain Opportunities. ndustrial Marketing Management, Volume 29,
pp. 7-18.
Brewer, P.
& Speh , T., 2001. Adapting the balanced scorecard to supply chain
management. Supply Chain Management Review , 5(2), p. 48–56.
Eccles, R.
G., Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G., 2014. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability
on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, ,
60(11), pp. 2835-2857.
George , J.,
2019. Evaluating Sustainability: Controversies,Challenges, and Opportunities.
Evaluating Sustainability: Evaluative Support for Managing Processes in
the Public Interest, Issue 162, p. 13–28.
Goel, P.,
2010. Triple bottom line reporting: An analytical approach for corporate
sustainability. ,. Journal of Finance, Accounting, and Management, 1(1),
pp. 27-42.
Heizer , J.,
Render , B. & Munson , C., 2020. OPERATIONS MANAMGEMENT. 13th ed.
Boston : Pearson.
Kaplan, R.
S. & David, N. P., 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy
into Action. 18th ed.. 18 ed. s.l.:Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kleindorfer
, P. R., Singhal, K. & Wassenhove, L. N. V., 2005. Sustainable Operations
Management. Production and Operations Management Society, 14(4), p.
482–492.
Kleindorfer,
P., Singhal, K. & Wassenhove, L., 2004. Sustainable Operations
Management. Production and Operations Management., 14(4), pp. 482-492.
Kotabe, M.
& Murray, J., 2004. Global sourcing strategy and sustainable competitive
advantage. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(1), pp. 7-14.
Krugman, P.,
1994. The Age of Diminished Expectations. 3rd ed. Cambridge: MIT.
Nestle,
2021. Environment : Nestle. [Online]
Available at: https://www.nestle.com/ask-nestle/environment
[Accessed 14 July 2021].
Project
Provenance Ltd, 2015. Blockchain: the solution for transparency in product
supply chains. [Online]
Available at: https://www.provenance.org/whitepaper
[Accessed 15 09 2019].
Robinson, C.
& Malhotra, M., 2005. Defining the concept of supply chain quality
management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice. International
Journal of Production Economics, 96(3), pp. 315-337.
Saberi, S.,
Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis , J. & Shen, L., 2019. Blockchain technology and
its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International
Journal of Production Research, 57(7), pp. 2117-2135.
Sajjad, A.,
Eweje, G. & Tappin, D., 2015. Sustainable Supply Chain Management:
Motivatorsand Barriers. Business Strategy and the Environment, Volume
24, p. 643–655.
Schoenherr,
T. & Speier-Pero, C., 2015. Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big
Data in Supply Chain Management: Current State and Future Potential. Journal
of Business Logistics, 36(1), pp. 120-132.
Sebastian,
T., Stefan, S. & Arnd, H., 2014. Reducing The Carbon Footprint Within
Fast Moving Consumer Goods Supply Chains through Collaboration: The
Manufacturers’ perspective. Journal of Supply chain Management, 50(4),
pp. 44-61.
Seuring, S.
& Müller, M., 2008. From a Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework
for Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15),
pp. 1699-1710.
SHRM
Foundation, 2012. HRM’s Role in Corporate Social and Environmental
Sustainability, United States of America: SHRM Foundation.
Smith, D.,
2012. How Employers Can Help Solve the Skills Gap. Harvard Business Review,
09 February.
The World
Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our common future, Oxford,
England: Oxford University Press.
Unilever,
2021. Carbon footprints – now it’s personal : Unilever. [Online]
Available at: https://www.unilever.com/news/news-and-features/Feature-article/2021/carbon-footprints-now-its-personal.html
[Accessed 14 July 2021].
Wittstruck,
D. & Teuteberg, F., 2012. Understanding the Success Factors of
Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Empirical Evidence from the Electrics
and Electronics Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 19(3).